<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NINE Olympic Sized Hurdles for February 2010 Retail SSS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.compweather.com/2010/02/olympic-size-hurdles-for-february-2010-retail-sss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.compweather.com/2010/02/olympic-size-hurdles-for-february-2010-retail-sss/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 22:19:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Hall</title>
		<link>http://blog.compweather.com/2010/02/olympic-size-hurdles-for-february-2010-retail-sss/comment-page-1/#comment-3335</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 22:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.compweather.com/?p=430#comment-3335</guid>
		<description>Thanks Bill! That helps to clarify -- I appreciate your follow-up comments greatly.
Charlie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Bill! That helps to clarify &#8212; I appreciate your follow-up comments greatly.<br />
Charlie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Kirk, CEO Weather Trends International</title>
		<link>http://blog.compweather.com/2010/02/olympic-size-hurdles-for-february-2010-retail-sss/comment-page-1/#comment-3306</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Kirk, CEO Weather Trends International</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.compweather.com/?p=430#comment-3306</guid>
		<description>Charlie,

Good morning.  Retailers for the most part were all well above expectations but many did comment that the record snow cost them 1% to 2% in lost sales.  Bottom line, they overcame 9 major hurdles but they were up against the easiest February comp ever last year which was -4.3% so the +3.7% gain captured most but not all of last year&#039;s huge losses.  The expectations for March have been set very low at +2.5% by Wall Street but with the first major Spring surge of warm weather late month around Easter, retailers are poised for a blow out month with exceptional sales gains well above expectations.  Why?  Because they&#039;ve had two back-to-back really bad March sales in 2008 = -2.3% and last year -5.1% due in large part to cold/snowy weather around Easter the past two years.  Net-net we missed this one but Wall Street was surprised by the prior 2 strong months so we&#039;re still up on the street! :)

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie,</p>
<p>Good morning.  Retailers for the most part were all well above expectations but many did comment that the record snow cost them 1% to 2% in lost sales.  Bottom line, they overcame 9 major hurdles but they were up against the easiest February comp ever last year which was -4.3% so the +3.7% gain captured most but not all of last year&#8217;s huge losses.  The expectations for March have been set very low at +2.5% by Wall Street but with the first major Spring surge of warm weather late month around Easter, retailers are poised for a blow out month with exceptional sales gains well above expectations.  Why?  Because they&#8217;ve had two back-to-back really bad March sales in 2008 = -2.3% and last year -5.1% due in large part to cold/snowy weather around Easter the past two years.  Net-net we missed this one but Wall Street was surprised by the prior 2 strong months so we&#8217;re still up on the street! <img src='http://blog.compweather.com/wti_wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Hall</title>
		<link>http://blog.compweather.com/2010/02/olympic-size-hurdles-for-february-2010-retail-sss/comment-page-1/#comment-3292</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 02:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.compweather.com/?p=430#comment-3292</guid>
		<description>Bill:
After your persuasive post on the downward expectations on February SSS sales due to snowmageddon conditions, I&#039;ve been checking the SSS reports released today (from ICSC and others) which seem to indicate a 4% increase for the month, which is actually higher than the 2-3% Wall Street expectations. Is this correct? If so, given your excellent track record, is this just one you missed this time?
Thanks for your input,
Charlie Hall</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill:<br />
After your persuasive post on the downward expectations on February SSS sales due to snowmageddon conditions, I&#8217;ve been checking the SSS reports released today (from ICSC and others) which seem to indicate a 4% increase for the month, which is actually higher than the 2-3% Wall Street expectations. Is this correct? If so, given your excellent track record, is this just one you missed this time?<br />
Thanks for your input,<br />
Charlie Hall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

